
Magento / Adobe Commerce
- Magento 2 and Adobe Commerce, including release lines approaching end of support, where the question is upgrade, migrate, or move to Mage-OS.
Most replatforming calls get made on vendor opinion instead.
“You have outgrown this platform. Time to move.”
“Migration is risky. We can optimise what is here.”
Both are answering a question they have a stake in. This review answers it from measurements taken in your own systems. Sometimes the answer is that migration is not worth doing yet. We say that too.
You are close to a platform decision and the evidence is thin:
Your platform version is approaching end of support — Magento 2 and Adobe Commerce release lines most often — and extending costs real money either way.
Integrations break in ways nobody predicts, and every release carries risk you cannot size.
Someone has proposed a replatform, and you want a read that does not come from a platform vendor.
Growth is flattening, and it is unclear whether the platform is the ceiling or something else is.
Page speed and Core Web Vitals are costing conversion, and nobody can say whether the performance problem is fixable where you are.
If none of these describe your situation, this review is early.
The real failure mode
It fails where two systems disagree about the same record.
Orders that exist in the platform but not in the ERP.
Stock counts that drift between the warehouse and the catalogue.
A payment that succeeded on the provider side and failed on yours.
Each of these is cheap to fix in isolation and expensive to discover a week after launch, under live traffic, when the team that built the migration has moved on.
These faults only appear under real volume and real edge cases. Finding them takes access to the systems and a deliberate look at the seams between them, which is most of what these two weeks are spent on.
Two pages from it. The structure is what every review produces; the figures here are illustrative.

Contested rows are where two systems write the same field. That is where migrations fail, and it stays invisible until real volume hits it.

Every finding carries what it is, how much of it there is, what it costs you now, and what it takes to fix.
Built from your systems, not a template. Performance on your live templates, integration failure patterns across ERP, PIM and CRM, order state handling, where the platform limits you and where it does not.
A recorded call where we show you what breaks. The recording stays with you, so people who missed the call still see the evidence.
Prioritised by what costs you most, not by what is easiest to sell.
Migrate or optimise, with the reasoning behind it.
Budget and timeline for whichever path the evidence supports, including what would move the range up or down.
The report is written to be forwarded. Your CFO should be able to read it without you translating it first.



Partner program
Lazy Ants is part of the Claude Partner Network, Anthropic's partner program for organizations helping businesses adopt Claude.
$3,850, fixed. No hourly billing and no scope negotiation after the fact. If you go ahead with the work we recommend, the fee credits toward that project, up to 10% of its value, for 60 days.
The credit does not change with the verdict. We have no financial reason to prefer one answer over the other, which is the point of paying for the review rather than asking a vendor for a free opinion.
Three endings, and we commit to all three.
Scope, a price range, a timeline and the reasoning. That package works with any vendor. We would like it to be us, and it does not have to be.
The same package for the smaller piece of work, usually with a faster return.
Sometimes the platform is not the constraint. If the real cost sits in a process, a data model, a team structure or the total cost of ownership of what surrounds the platform, we say so, and the review has still saved you a six-figure decision.
You are buying a decision. What you do with it is yours.
If yours is not here, ask on the first call. We would rather talk you out of this than sell you a review that does not fit.